[quagga-users 14781] Re: FRR or Quagga
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> Mon, 28 Aug 2017 19:40:46 +0100 (BST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.quagga.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 28 Aug 2017, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > At least on FreeBSD, net/frr is a port and therefore, switching > between quagga and free looks pretty straigtforward. The Quagga project had informal legal advice years ago on something. The principle of which everyone accepted (whether it convenient or not) at the time. Later, certain people now with FRR disagreed with that advice. We took formal legal advice, based on a query Martin Winter helped formulate, from a solicitor who looked at the actual code. The same advice came back. Based on that advice, the manner in which FRR are distributing the Quagga codebase is not in accordance with the GPL licence given with the work. Therefore, the general GPL licence on that code base is not available to them to distribute that code-base, and they are infringing upon the copyright of others. I object to any of my code being distributed in a manner that is at odds with the advice we received. Advice which at least some FRRers are aware of. regards, -- Paul Jakma | [email protected] | @pjakma | Key ID: 0xD86BF79464A2FF6A Fortune: Someone is speaking well of you. How unusual!