[quagga-users 14847] Re: MULTIPLE ZEBRA INSTANCES
Alessandro Gaballo <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:50:34 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.quagga.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <DB6P190MB0392CD8F5DF270A6B1791B11D4450@DB6P190MB0392.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> |
Sorry for the late answer, I was traveling. I'm using miniNext at the moment, it's the most recent version of mininet extreme and I'm trying to run the example by just using ospf instead of bgp. I activated the daemon in the daemons file and I set up this simple configuration for each of the routers with the loopback address: router ospf network 10.0.1.0/24 area 0 When I analyze traffic no ospf packets are exchanged, could you help me? On 12/10/2017 01:32, Bengt Gördén wrote: > Den 2017-10-10 kl. 18:45, skrev Alessandro Gaballo: >> I'm trying to run quagga on mininet because I need OSPF. >> From what I've understood I need a zebra instance and an ospfd instance >> on each switch; since everything is running on the same machine, how do >> I configure each ospf daemon to talk with a difference instance of zebra? >> >> I have another question, what's the meaning of the interface in the >> zebra configuration file? > As the walkthrough says mininet should be able to use containers but > currently not doing that. See last part of: > http://mininet.org/walkthrough/#interact-with-hosts-and-switches > > But. There is a version of mininet that supports PID namespaces and > hence makes it possible to use conatiners. It's somewhat a bit old > though. It's supported up to mininet 2.1.0. > > https://github.com/sk2/mininet-extreme > > https://github.com/sk2/mininet-extreme/tree/master/examples#quaggapy > > > regards, > > _______________________________________________ Quagga-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-users