Re: [rancid] mtrancid +- connection closed? Conf Diff

Jason Wu <[email protected]> Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:04:35 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.network.rancid
Message-ID <CAEPdWnBRtty+9NpvY-rZpCwpG_k_cajXvAKYE3JLeo4JmapFSA@mail.gmail.com>
Thank you for your response

Yup, these routers are running on version 6.38.7 along side with routers
that do not have this issue.
There does not seem to be any regularity/pattern to this. As the dates are
rather staggered apart. Some days it'll be continuous for a week other
times it'll be a week before re-appearing.

I am unable to reproduce it running mtrancid at the shell.(No email for a
configuration diff). Going through the different SVN diffs gives me

-Connection to <myrouter> closed
============================
+Connection to <myrouter> closed

thanks for your time

On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 9:51 AM heasley <[email protected]> wrote:

> Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 03:06:31PM -0800, Jason Wu:
> > Hello friends,
> >
> > Just have a question regarding mtrancid
> > For some reason I have been getting router config diffs emails which
> > contain only +- connection close, which doesn't reflect a config change
> and
> > is strange.
> >
> > This only occurs on 1-2 devices
> >
> > Rancid 3.6.1
> > =====================================
> > Sample
> >
> > Revision 100
> > - Connection to <myrouter> closed.
> >
> > =====================================
> >
> > Revision 98
> >
> > + Connection to <myrouter> closed.
> >
> >
> > =====================================
> >
> > Mtrancid consists of
> > systempackageprintdetail
> > systemrouterboardprint
> > export
> >
> > It seems that mtrancid is picking up the SSH session close
> > Logs do not show any errors which means its reaching the end of run and
> has
> > a clean exit right?
>
> yes.
>
> are these running the same versoin as the routers that are not exibiting
> the error?  does it occur with any regularity?  can you reproduce it
> running mtrancid at the shell?
>
> > I am able to run all these commands with no problem and rancid-run gives
> me
> > no errors/hiccups.
> > Execution is smooth and does not have any delays (<1minute)
> >
> > If there was a problem, the end-of-run detection would pick it up?
> >
> > Just going through the script and I can’t seem to identify where/why this
> > would get picked up.
> > I was wondering if anyone else has experienced this before. I could
> always
> > filter out the "connection closed" but I am curious why this is
> happening.
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Rancid-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/rancid-discuss