Re: [rancid] [SPAM?] Cisco NX "chatty" with Power info

FF <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:07:13 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.network.rancid
Message-ID <CAD=tpedwO0YS-WZ4bsh1GpY_zcDFg5jk4X=F=O1t=G4sgD38JQ@mail.gmail.com>
ok,

So upgraded to 3.9 with the same behavior.

Built a cisco-nxp personality that had an | exclude OK line on it to remove
the wattage line... but suddenly rancid couldn't log in to those units.
Even though clogin would work fine. Went and modified the cisco-nx
definition... but the exclude is ignored.

So now 2.3 and 3.9 behave identically in this situation...

This is the whole output for the section in question:

Index: configs/10.10.10.114

===================================================================

retrieving revision 1.1157

diff -u -4 -r1.1157 10.10.10.114

@@ -80,10 +80,10 @@

  !Env: Power                              Actual        Total

  !Env: Supply    Model                    Input      Capacity       Status

  !Env:                                    (Watts )     (Watts )

  !Env: -------  ----------  ---------------  ------  ----------
--------------------

- !Env: 1        N9K-PAC-1200W-B                     192 W      1200 W
Ok

- !Env: 2        N9K-PAC-1200W-B                     174 W      1200 W
Ok

+ !Env: 1        N9K-PAC-1200W-B                     190 W      1200 W
Ok

+ !Env: 2        N9K-PAC-1200W-B                     176 W      1200 W
Ok

  !Env: Power Usage Summary:

  !Env: --------------------

  !Env: Power Supply redundancy mode (configured)
PS-Redundant

  !Env: Power Supply redundancy mode (operational)
PS-Redundant

Any suggestions?

Thanks in advance!



On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 5:02 PM FF <[email protected]> wrote:

> Apparently I'm running a massively old version (2.3.8). I'll try upgrading
> to 3.9 first.
>
> thanks in advance
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 4:47 PM heasley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 07:06:45PM +0000, Nick Nauwelaerts:
>> > what version of rancid & nx-os are you running?
>>
>> good question.
>>
>> if the answer is 3.9, please show us the complete output of show
>> environment power
>>
>> > i notice you only have 1 column less as me, you seem to miss "actual
>> output".
>> >
>> >
>> > // nick
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: Rancid-discuss [mailto:[email protected]] On
>> Behalf Of FF
>> > Sent: Friday, March 8, 2019 18:05
>> > To: [email protected]
>> > Subject: [SPAM?] [rancid] Cisco NX "chatty" with Power info
>> >
>> >
>> > !Env: Power                              Actual        Total
>> >
>> >   !Env: Supply    Model                    Input      Capacity
>>  Status
>> >
>> >   !Env:                                    (Watts )     (Watts )
>> >
>> >   !Env: -------  ----------  ---------------  ------  ----------
>> --------------------
>> >
>> > - !Env: 1        N9K-PAC-1200W-B                     180 W      1200 W
>>     Ok
>> >
>> > + !Env: 1        N9K-PAC-1200W-B                     182 W      1200 W
>>     Ok
>> >
>> >   !Env: 2        N9K-PAC-1200W-B                     162 W      1200 W
>>     Ok
>> >
>> >   !Env: Power Usage Summary:
>> >
>> > Every time Rancid runs, we get erroneous reports because the power
>> usage fluctuates by 1-2 watts per run. Any suggestions on how to keep the
>> good information (availability, etc) without getting this level of detail?
>> >
>> > thanks in advance!
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > FF
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> >
>> > Volg Aquafin op Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/AquafinNV> | Twitter<
>> https://twitter.com/aquafinnv> | YouTube<
>> http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCk_4P5BJ-MtEEDCkCsR_KqQ?feature=mhee> |
>> LinkedIN<http://www.linkedin.com/company/aquafin/products> | Instagram<
>> https://www.instagram.com/aquafin_nv/>
>> >
>> > In het kader van de uitoefening van onze taken verzamelen we bij
>> Aquafin persoonsgegevens. Hoe we omgaan met deze gegevens en wat de rechten
>> van de betrokkenen zijn, kan je nalezen in onze privacy policy<
>> https://www.aquafin.be/nl-be/privacy-policy>.
>> >
>> >   P Denk aan het milieu. Druk deze mail niet onnodig af.
>>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Rancid-discuss mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/rancid-discuss
>>
>>
>
> --
> FF
>


-- 
FF

_______________________________________________
Rancid-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/rancid-discuss