Re: [rancid] git vs svn
Ugo Bellavance <[email protected]> Sat, 14 Dec 2019 16:47:08 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.rancid |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACSSk+UqAB9RQfa1idq++GEREg5Ob50cBo1NP8reMP9=NLaRkw@mail.gmail.com> |
--===============5641164098408063317== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000035ae950599b0ec39" --00000000000035ae950599b0ec39 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I personally think that implementing a remote copy of the repo with git is a big plus. We're currently using SVN but I'd like to make the move. On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 2:16 PM john heasley <[email protected]> wrote: > Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 01:20:37PM +0000, Wayne Eisenberg: > > I'm considering changing over to git from svn for my rancid version > control. A brief Google search seems to show that converting from one to > the other is not terribly difficult. (So I don't have to lose my history.) > > > > For those who are using git with rancid, what has the experience been > like? Worth doing? Stay with SVN? Doesn't really matter? > > I use all three - IMO, religion. git is slightly easier to implement a > remote > copy of the repo. both are much faster than cvs. > > _______________________________________________ > Rancid-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/rancid-discuss > -- Ugo Bellavance ([email protected]) --00000000000035ae950599b0ec39 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">I personally think that implementing a remote copy of the = repo with git is a big plus. We're currently using SVN but I'd like= to make the move.<br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr"= class=3D"gmail_attr">On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 2:16 PM john heasley <<a h= ref=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>> wrote:<br></di= v><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;borde= r-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 01= :20:37PM +0000, Wayne Eisenberg:<br> > I'm considering changing over to git from svn for my rancid versio= n control. A brief Google search seems to show that converting from one to = the other is not terribly difficult. (So I don't have to lose my histor= y.)<br> > <br> > For those who are using git with rancid, what has the experience been = like? Worth doing? Stay with SVN? Doesn't really matter?<br> <br> I use all three - IMO, religion.=C2=A0 git is slightly easier to implement = a remote<br> copy of the repo.=C2=A0 both are much faster than cvs.<br> <br> _______________________________________________<br> Rancid-discuss mailing list<br> <a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank">Rancid-di= [email protected]</a><br> <a href=3D"http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/rancid-discuss" rel=3D= "noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/ra= ncid-discuss</a><br> </blockquote></div><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"g= mail_signature">Ugo Bellavance (<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"= _blank">[email protected]</a>)<br></div> --00000000000035ae950599b0ec39-- --===============5641164098408063317== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Rancid-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/rancid-discuss --===============5641164098408063317==--