Re: Presentations from San Diego
David R Oran <[email protected]> Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:37:50 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.research.irtf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
My recollection corresponds to Yakov's. both BGP and IDRP were well along by the time 1126 came around. There was a lot of parallel work during those years, and a lot of cross-fertilization, but I don't think 1126 played much of a role. Dave. On Aug 10, 2004, at 10:40 AM, Yakov Rekhter wrote: > Avri, > > Quoting from draft-irtf-routing-history-01.txt (section 2.1): > > RFC1126 outlined a set of requirements that were to guide the > development of BGP. > > The above statement is blatantly false. The development of BGP > was NOT guided by rfc1126, and I know this for a fact, as I am one > of the co-authors of the BGP spec (starting from rfc1105). > > With this in mind I would suggest to replace the above sentence with > the following: > > The development of BGP happened completely independently of > RFC1126. In other words, from the point of view of the development > of BGP, RFC1126 is totally irrelevant. > > Yakov. > _______________________________________________ > irtf-rr mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/irtf-rr > David R. Oran Cisco Fellow Cisco Systems 7 Ladyslipper Lane Acton, MA 01720 USA Tel: +1 978 264 2048 Email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ irtf-rr mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/irtf-rr