RE: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-SPF

Senthil,

-> Just go through *http://www.cs.bu.edu/fac/matta/Papers/jsac95.ps*.
-> They do for two TOS classes: delay and throughput in a non-FCFS
-> scheduling environment. you are suggesting for n- classes. 
-> The paper concludes based on simulations and analytical results
-> using liapunov functions that there is some reduction in end-to-end 
                                          ^^^^

-> delay.
-> So for just coming to one conclusion, the authors have done lot 
-> of simulation and analytical work. But it is unfortunate that you
-> are making sweeping conclusions without a valid proof.
  
  You misunderstood me. I am not concluding anything. 
  I am giving my own view in a different perspective and 
  letting you know how we can co-relate recent events.

  Let me go through the above paper - I will get back to you.

-> I will reply detaily later today.But before that clarify 
-> these points,
-> - you all accept that diffrout is not going to solve any problem.
                                                        ^^^
  
  Let us see :) You are contradicting your-self. Just in the above
  para you said "SOME reduction in end-to-end performance" and
  again said "diffrout is not going to solve ANY problem".

  If that SOME reduction is tolerable then, I think, we solved
  SOME problem. Thus I can prove that that statement 
  "diffrout is not going to solve ANY problem" is incorrect.

--
Venkata