Re: AW: AW: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-SPF
shen jing <[email protected]> Wed, 14 Aug 2002 22:03:17 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.research.irtf |
|---|---|
| Organization | State Key Lab of CAD&CG |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hummel, the crankback could be assumed, but the difficulty exists with when it is triggered. No matter how the two trees are estabilished, the network traffic is shown to be=20 self-similar, and with the increase of bandwidth*delay burst traffic occurs frequently. If a router react to transient overload, there may be a huge burden on dealing with such=20 operations. So, I think this mechanism may be adpoted for broken links but not for congestion. >=20 > Let's assume there are two Smallest Size Tree road systems X1 and X2. X= 2 detours/avoids the kernel links of X1. > For some source/destination node pair the total pathes may be different= . Or only the section in the middle is different. > Or only a section close to the source (or close to the dest.) is differ= ent. Whatever applies: > >From the point of congestion on road system X1 the packet my crankback= (hereby source and dest. address are swapped) > to that first node which is also part of X2. > There source and dest. address are swapped again, DSCP-X1 is replaced= by DSCP-X2 and the packet is moved forward > via X2. >=20 > Heinrich >=20 > -----Urspr=A8=B9ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: shen jing [mailto:[email protected]] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. August 2002 14:21 > An: [email protected] > Cc: 'Hummel Heinrich'; '[email protected]' > Betreff: Re: AW: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-SPF >=20 > The discussion you mentioned is that of congestion removement by e2e > mechanism or by routing. Professor Crowcroft proposed a method > named ECN++ which trigger a new path that acts when ECN bit is set > in packet header. >=20 > > > > Heinrich, > > > > -> yes,it is similar; > > -> but here it is about state-less IP forwarding, i.e. about > > -> forwarding the individual IP packets, without any > > -> RSVP path and without any MPLS path. > > > > Oh! Ok...you would like to do Crankback in > > connection less IP environments?!? > > > > In such a case, you might find below paper interesting: > > http://www.ecse.rpi.edu/Homepages/shivkuma/research/papers/te-latest.= pdf > > > > There was some discussion in E2E list regarding > > pros & cons of this approach. I couldn't find the URL > > but I vaguely remember that the subject of the discussion > > is "EC++N" or something like that... > > > > -- --=20 Jing Shen State Key Lab of CAD&CG ZheJiang University(YuQuan) HangZhou, Z.J. 310027 P.R.China Tel: +86-571-87932423 Mobile: (0)13516813753 Email: [email protected] ********************************************************************** * The SunShine of life is made up of very little beams which is * * bright all the time * ********************************************************************** _______________________________________________ Irtf-rr mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/irtf-rr