Re: IP Table Size
"Poh Tze Ven" <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Feb 2003 17:48:05 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.research.irtf |
|---|---|
| Organization | University of Essex |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, > It would help if your categorization made more sense. With a few > hundred thousand routes, why exclude the few hundred (at most) ASBR? The size of IP table from ASBR can be very different from an internal router. I only need data from internal routers, and do not wish the information from ASBR to bias it. > Unless you mean exclude the ASE routes and count the intra-area and > inter-area routes. No, I try to study the ASE routes visible to internal routers. > The routing information base (RIB) is what really > matters, not the FIB, unless you are trying to build hardware and > looking for what the ASIC FIB sizes should be. I think I have made myself clear, I need FIB not RIB. Your last point is close to what I am interested in (but not designing ASIC of that sort). Anyway if you study ASBR carefully (which certainly you do), most of them use more than 95% of RIB for FIB. > If you are interested > in the IGP size you need to know number of nodes (routers in an OSPF > area, IS in an ISIS level) and adjacencies, which is relevant if your > interest is computational scaling. It might help to first learn the > terminology and get a clue as to what questions make sense to ask > before asking. I know what I am asking for. Thanks. The IGP size is not all that important, I only want to do some rough correlation with the table size. > You might also have more success looking at the various sites that > provide full routing information and counting the routes yourself. > You won't find the number of unaggregated routes inside any given ISP, > just the global routing information. I do not need the details and I am aware of the availability of such ASBR routing information but that is not I am after. I need internal router routing information and that cannot be found in the Net. > You also won't find the number > of nodes and adjacencies if that is what you are after. No > Last I heard it was around 250,000 routes for the largest ISPs with > some routers having 1,000,000 route instances (more than one way to > get there from here). Its a moving target. You can find number of > routers and a rough idea of out degree (leading to number of links) > from some past presentations at NANOG or elsewhere. Again I am not seeking for such info. The reason for (iii) is that if given (ii) I would like to correlate it with (iii) My requirements are nothing as complicated as what you have thought. cheers! _______________________________________________ irtf-rr mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/irtf-rr