Re : Re: Kernel mode with a recent kernel

Hi Eddy,

Thanks for your answer.

In a first time, we could probably only use kernel mode without polling, so patchless click could be fine. But on a longer run, I would say that yes, we will need polling mode.
I will try patchless mode in a first time, and will still try to work to use polling in a second time.

Best regards,
Fabrice

----- Eddie Kohler <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Hi Fabrice,
> 
> Do you need to use polling mode? If not, many people have experience with more 
> recent kernels, using the patchless mode -- no patch required.
> 
> Eddie
> 
> 
> On 12/06/2011 04:44 AM, Fabrice Schuler wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I tried to use Click in kernel mode, but I faced a problem as I need a
> > recent enough kernel version, and the last supported version, 2.6.24.7,
> > is unfortunately too old for me to be able to use it.
> > I tried to adapt click's patch to a more recent version of the kernel
> > (2.6.35.13 to be precise, but whatever), but I couldn't make it.
> >
> > Does any of you runs click in kernel mode, with a more recent version
> > than 2.6.24.7, and if so, could he/she send me the
> > procedure/patch/whatever that would help ?
> >
> > Thanks a lot,
> > Fabrice
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (OpenBSD)
> >
> > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO3eQDAAoJEL2/ouHeevJ4TKgH/2HDZPjB5KZS+534Y2Hm2e13
> > pymy1Avw86MZDHSRL5Mg4xkSXmJ9/ixLkmZaHkswhiqYK6ADLbJLz2ez+SqMib0D
> > DSN37ltIXOWw8Qrt9ofI5ri2K4eBC5pPCtx3+mcNdFL2DhblsIc0kEKsAq9DTqV+
> > yF7+TL8JZfdwNBufJm/BZS2sIIvTTFxakoVZuBSXjvxjqaNXNlZGjThUMWiWOadD
> > ydZnQCATka1aiekBb4RNv9oPhWNQSDm/xkKMwPN63VQa6lihBs/wfJniectcNXP+
> > 9eQXwW+SVNN5hDpsELYSASX9s6GJj0/ZEut99eU+z7obEgHdvf4pHdH20PmiICw=
> > =3xe4
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > _______________________________________________
> > click mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click