Re: Rsync sends again already existing files
Stephane Ascoet via rsync <[email protected]> Thu, 29 Jun 2023 22:31:17 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.rsync.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Kevin Korb <[email protected]> le 29/06/2023 04:52: > --itemize-changes will cause rsync to tell you what it thinks is Hi, thank you so much! Today I used a little different way of doing it, and another computer, and the behaviour is the same. It seems that the reason is a different timestamp. So the whole file is replaced just for this? I've always read that Rsync was using an advanced checksum mecanism instead of timestamps-only? > different. Also, -z is counter-productive when rsync isn't networking. Thanks again. It seems that "--progress" is redondant with "-P"(but it's because I use a list of rsync commands skeletons, and some doesn't have "-P" and I want to be sure to always have the progress indication). But, since I will now always use "-i", do "-v" and "--progress" add something to "-i"? > -- Sincerely, Stephane Ascoet -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html