Re: Diff between using "-i" and not using "-i"
Kevin Korb via rsync <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Jun 2024 07:32:53 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.rsync.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It appears that xattr changes (that is what the x mens) never made it into the verbose output. I would call that a bug but I would rather it be fixed by making -v include -i. On 6/3/24 05:22, - via rsync wrote: > Hi, > > Version: sync version 3.3.0 protocol version 31 > > If I do a <rsync -avhHXASDn --del /mnt/ /foo/mnt/> > > I get: > ================= > sending incremental file list > var/log/journal/ > > sent 263,31K bytes received 1,14K bytes 528,90K bytes/sec > total size is 294,92M speedup is 1.115,21 (DRY RUN) > ================= > > including option <-i>: > > rsync -avhHXASDin --del /mnt/ /foo/mnt/ > > I get: > ================= > sending incremental file list > .f........x usr/bin/ping > .d.......a. var/log/journal/ > > sent 263,31K bytes received 1,14K bytes 528,90K bytes/sec > total size is 294,92M speedup is 1.115,21 (DRY RUN) > ================= > > How is that, that "usr/bin/ping" is not included / included in > results? That is no feature, is it? > > Yours lopiuh > -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html