Re: Diff between using "-i" and not using "-i"

Kevin Korb via rsync <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Jun 2024 07:32:53 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.network.rsync.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
It appears that xattr changes (that is what the x mens) never made it 
into the verbose output.  I would call that a bug but I would rather it 
be fixed by making -v include -i.

On 6/3/24 05:22, - via rsync wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Version: sync  version 3.3.0  protocol version 31
> 
> If I do a <rsync -avhHXASDn --del  /mnt/ /foo/mnt/>
> 
> I get:
> =================
> sending incremental file list
> var/log/journal/
> 
> sent 263,31K bytes  received 1,14K bytes  528,90K bytes/sec
> total size is 294,92M  speedup is 1.115,21 (DRY RUN)
> =================
> 
> including option <-i>:
> 
> rsync -avhHXASDin --del  /mnt/ /foo/mnt/
> 
> I get:
> =================
> sending incremental file list
> .f........x usr/bin/ping
> .d.......a. var/log/journal/
> 
> sent 263,31K bytes  received 1,14K bytes  528,90K bytes/sec
> total size is 294,92M  speedup is 1.115,21 (DRY RUN)
> =================
> 
> How is that, that "usr/bin/ping" is not included / included in
> results? That is no feature, is it?
> 
> Yours lopiuh
> 

-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html