Re: rsync static builds 1.6.5 -> 3.4.1 - anyone ?
matthew patton via rsync <[email protected]> Sun, 8 Mar 2026 05:48:35 +0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.rsync.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
do you have the patches to the Makefile? IMO most 'base' utilities should be built static in the first place. memory to cheap and disk is cheaper. Shared-libs are just begging for supply-chain attacks (nee garbage like NPM) -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html