Re: rsync and outrage

I obviously meant "if you haven't UNsubscribed yet..."

On 04/06/2026 21:11, Andreas Croci via rsync wrote:
> If you haven't subscribed yet, and you still receive this reply, would 
> you care to elaborate on what the "currently prevalent legal, 
> political and economic framework" in the use of LLMs is? Or at least 
> provide sources? I would be very interested in that.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Andreas
>
> On 04/06/2026 20:41, Ian Z via rsync wrote:
>> With everyone piling up in support, I have to provide to lone contrary
>> voice :-P
>>
>> I don't want to be an asshole about it; I still respect Tridge and
>> everyone who has contributed to rsync and made it such a versatile
>> tool. I just strongly and clearly disagree about this. My position is
>> that under the currently prevalent legal, political and economic
>> framework any use of LLMs and their fruits is unethical, even if it
>> seems to provide a short term benefit to an individual or a team.
>>
>> So I'll be replacing all uses of rsync on my systems, and
>> unsubscribing from this list in short order.
>>
>> Thanks for all the fish.
>>
>

-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html