Re: Configure samba with pam authorization

"adrian.liu--- via samba" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.samba.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Stefan,

Thanks for your help.

It's really a good idea to use OpenLDAP Proxy. I will try this solution today.




[email protected]
 
From: Stefan Kania via samba
Date: 2026-01-30 17:36
To: samba
Subject: Re: [Samba] Configure samba with pam authorization
Did you try to setup a OpenLDAP Proxy with rwm-overlay to rewrite the names of your needed attributes
 
Am 30.01.26 um 07:39 schrieb adrian.liu--- via samba:
> Hi samba experts:
> 
> I have been struggling with a samba configuration problem, and I could not find a solution which I might need your help : )
> 
> VersionInfo
> OS Version: ubuntu-24.04.3
> Samba Version: Version 4.19.5-Ubuntu
> 
> Requirement
> 1. A group of users will need to access Linux (Ubuntu) shared folder (/opt/shared) via Window desktop.
> 2. Each of the user will use their own username/password, and the backend userinfo was stored in a OpenLDAP server.
> 3. The OpenLDAP server was maintained by a central user management team, and the team only offered a readonly LDAP account (the userinfo followed RFC2307 LDAP Schema).
> 
> Problem
> Because we only have readonly LDAP account, we could not add samba-specific attributes to LDAP, such as sambaSamAccount/sambaNTPassword/sambaSID/etc to the existing LDAP server. Therefore, we could not make samba to access to OpenLDAP directly, by below config:
> [global]
>      workgroup = WORKGROUP
>      netbios name = SAMBA-LDAP
>      server string = Samba Server Direct LDAP
> 
>      passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://192.168.31.131:389
>      ldap suffix = dc=sas,dc=com
>      ldap user suffix = ou=People
>      ldap group suffix = ou=Groups
>      ldap admin dn = cn=admin,dc=sas,dc=com
>      ldap passwd sync = yes
>      ldap ssl = start_tls
>      ldap tls cacert = /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt
> 
> ......
> (It required to add samba-specific attributes (sambaSamAccount、sambaSID、sambaNTPassword)to user info, which I cannot do)
> 
> We were pursuing a way to delegate the authentication and authorization process to PAM/NSS, therefore we choose the solution of:  Samba -> PAM/NSS -> SSSD -> OpenLdap, which seemed to be very feasible.
> 
> I have attached the my current configuration file:
> /etc/samba/smb.conf
> /etc/pam.d/samba
> /etc/nsswitch.conf
> /etc/sssd/sssd.conf
> 
> And I have done below tests:
> 1. Find a test user sas1 with password sas111 in OpenLDAP
> 2. Execute: getent passwd sas1 and id sas1, the command worked successfully, which meant NSS -> SSSD -> OpenLdap configured currectly
> 3. Execute: su - sas1 with password sas111, the command worked successfully, which meant PAM -> SSSD -> OpenLdap configured currectly
> 4. Execute: pamtester samba sas1 authenticate with password sas111, the command worked successfully, which also meant PAM -> SSSD -> OpenLdap configured currectly
> 5. Create the user sas1 in samba passdb with command pdbedit -a -u sas1 -N, setting the password to blank. If using PAM in samba, it required to create the users in samba passdb as placeholder.
> 
> When I tried to execute command: smbclient //localhost/shared -U sas1%sas111, it generate a NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE error.
> 
>  From /var/log/samba/log.127.0.0.1, we could see that it was caused by - it never used PAM to do authorization, and it still try to authorize the in local passdb.
> 
> Based on the document, it said if we set passdb backend = tdbsam --  if passdb failed to authorize, it would use PAM instead of passdb.
> 
> Could you help me check why samba failed to authorize with PAM and how to make it work correctly ?
> 
> 
> 
> [email protected]
 
-- 
Stefan Kania
Landweg 13
25693 St. Michaelisdonn
 
 
 
 
 
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.