Re: ShareSecurity with OverlandStorage Server aka SnapServer
"Christopher R. Hertel" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.samba.java |
|---|---|
| Organization | ubiqx Development, uninq. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mazhar Lateef wrote: > Hi Christopher, > > Does this mean Jcifs will not be compatible with SMB V2, I never said that, and I don't think I said anything in my e'mail that would suggest it. Currently, however, jCIFS does not support SMB2 but that's okay because every server of which I am aware still supports SMB1. All I was trying to point out is that SMB/CIFS is a complex protocol and ever server will behave a bit differently. In addition, every configuration variation will cause a difference in behavior. > Regarding the SnapServer, I will try to find out about the configuration > options available, and see if there is anything that is forcing this > behaviour of returning the Everyone Group. Forcing or enabling. The Windows ownership and permissions system is complicated, and also quite different from the Unix/Posix/Linux system. A mapping has to occur in order to ensure that permissions work as expected. > Many Thanks for your input. Welcome. Chris -)----- > > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Christopher R. Hertel <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I *believe*, but do not know for sure, that the SnapServer product > runs Samba. > > The SMB/CIFS protocol is not the same per platform. Every > implementation > (including different Windows versions) has variations. The protocol > is too > large and too complex for there to be a viable conformance test. In > addition, the semantics of SMB/CIFS and now SMB2 are tied very > closely to > Windows and NTFS semantics. Any server that is not running on > Windows must > translate semantics between those expected by the platform and those > expected by the protocol. It gets tricky. > > All that said... There is probably a configuration parameter on the > SnapServer that is set in such a way that it is always returning the > "Everyone" group. I do not know what configuration interface > SnapServers > make available. > > Chris -)----- > > Mazhar Lateef wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > We are currently working with a client using an overland Storage > > appliance aka SnapServer running Guardian OS. Jcifs seems to work ok, > > except it does not seem to return the correct share security > information > > of the Shared folder. The same application when used in a windows > > environment works absolutely fine and returns the correct information. > > > > The client's appliance is integrated with a AD and the shared > > permissions are applied to security groups from the AD. Jcifs seems to > > ALWAYS return the everyone group even when the share security does not > > have everyone listed in the Allow permissions. > > > > Can anyone help please? does anyone know anything about SnapServer and > > why the share security may not be working? I would have thought > the CIFS > > protocol will be the same regardless of the platform. > > > > Any help, guidance, pointers would be much appreciated. > > > > Maz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X > Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel > jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)----- ubiqx development, > uninq. > ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)----- [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/ -)----- [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > > > > -- > Mazhar Lateef > > Virtualcode Solutions LTD - London > www.virtualcode.co.uk <http://www.virtualcode.co.uk> > Tel : +44 (0)20 3286 1246 > Fax : +44 (0)207 900 3460 > > -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)----- ubiqx development, uninq. ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)----- [email protected] OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/ -)----- [email protected]