It's a matter of respecting what you call intellectual property.

But whatever you make of it, he isn't a Sun employee any longer.
Without any basis in fact.
By donating code to the GPL, the patent freedom goes with it. Whatever
is left standing will be firmly inside Microsoft's embrace, and you know
as well as I do what that historically means.
That is a no no, so she ruled that the evidence that wasn't on the table
with sufficient specificity, as ordered,  by the discovery cutoff
deadline could not be used by SCO.

GGG

EXPLOSION!

Date: Monday, November 27, 2006
Company: CHINA HEALTH MGT NEW
Symbol: C N H C
Price: $1.44 (UP 7%! on Friday)
Projected: $8

C N H C  HAS BEGUN BOOMING! CHINA IS THE HOTTEST COUNTRY TO BE IN RIGHT
NOW! ADD  C N H C  TO YOUR RADAR!

GGG

What do you call that? org, and there are many alternatives.
I believe that is obvious now.
Watch what the children are able to do, how they can learn even on their
own because of the design of the software. We saw the same flaw in the
DaimlerChrysler and AutoZone cases, a lack of research to avoid
bizarrely inappropriate allegations. Witness what we've done with
Solaris, and now, what we've done with Java.
The  problem is the idea.
You'll laugh, snort, and then  perhaps get mad at SCO, if you're like me
and have a sense of justice.
It will help you to understand why I refuse to link to any of his
articles.
No evidence was destroyed. Explain that to your shareholders.
You're trying to put new wine into old wineskins, as the saying goes,
and it won't work. The folks they need to speak to are the Software
Freedom Law Center.
They are an IP creator, not just a redistributor, so there is no royalty
required to be paid to anybody. Witness what we've done with Solaris,
and now, what we've done with Java. Watch what the children are able to
do, how they can learn even on their own because of the design of the
software.
You're trying to put new wine into old wineskins, as the saying goes,
and it won't work.
Here's the full press release, so you can reach your own conclusions.
That last is the key to the difference in the reactions in the FOSS
community.
The second time was when  he got System V tapes to be used to bid on a
project for Bell Atlantic, and when the project was scrapped, he was
never asked for the tapes back. It's the overwhelming choice of license,
so the Novell deal implicates their work.
Why did they choose GPL? Without any basis in fact. Something may have
turned up in discovery, making SCO want to cut discovery short after
all.
How do you like this sentence?
In neither case was he told to keep any of the code confidential or to
return it or destroy it.
Like they're not already.
However, option vesting will accelerate upon a change in control of the
Company and upon the declaration by the Board of the payment of a
dividend to the common stockholders of the Company. If IBM wins first,
clearly that helps Novell's case. SCO has to know that they are raising
a bogus issue, I think, but they did it anyway. They are taking a very
close look at that right now, and the hint is very likely yes, it could
happen. org, and  the GPL wasn't implicated in any way.
By donating code to the GPL, the patent freedom goes with it.
With all our faults and the variety of views, as a group we will stick
together when it counts.
Just one more manufactured smear against IBM that doesn't bear close
examination.
How do you like this sentence? But when you see a party suddenly
shifting strategies in the middle of the stream and heading back in the
opposite direction, it usually means they are afraid of drowning.
It's the overwhelming choice of license, so the Novell deal implicates
their work. StarOffice was protected, which kind of put a bit of shade
over OpenOffice.
No evidence was destroyed. Of course, I would expect MSN would say that,
and Microsoft has no trouble finding people in the media willing to
express  what I think Microsoft would like said.
If we are unable to work the situation out peacefully, that may change.
Novell has sent a letter to Judge Dale Kimball, with a suggestion. We
strongly challenge those statements here. I'll try to fill in the blanks
as I have time.
Just one more manufactured smear against IBM that doesn't bear close
examination.
Why does this matter? So, would that mean that if  there could be a
sudden change of control or a decision to pay dividends to common
stockholders, he'd already have a little pocket change?
They mention the patent aspect of the deal, by the way, prominently.
Of course, I would expect MSN would say that, and Microsoft has no
trouble finding people in the media willing to express  what I think
Microsoft would like said.
Schwartz says it's a curious thing if IBM is opposing the GPL.
Schwartz says it's a curious thing if IBM is opposing the GPL.