Re: progress to serveez-0.2

> From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]>
> To: Julian Graham <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 12:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [dev-serveez] progress to serveez-0.2
> =

>()  Julian Graham <[email protected]>
> () Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:23:25 -0400
> =

> =A0  Just started looking at Serveez for a project I'm working on
> =A0  and realized the latest release doesn't build against Guile
> =A0  2.0.x.=A0 ...And then I found this thread!=A0 Is the "next" branch
> =A0  in the repository currently usable / buildable?=A0 Is there any
> =A0  way I can help with Guile stuff?=A0 (Short of answering Mike's
> =A0  question about binary types [0] for which I lack the requisite
> =A0  knowledge of Serveez internals...)
> =

> This thread is old because in the meantime i've been practicing my
> portability chops w/ other packages (mostly w/ Guile 1.8, but w/
> occasional forays into 2.x land), neglecting Serveez for many
> months now.=A0 Probably i will have gained enough experience in the
> next few weeks to answer Mike's question adequately.
> =

> (Yeah, lame answer.=A0 But the truth is that i'm slow.)

The 'next' branch in Git builds and runs=A0for me.
=A0
Also, I've got a hacked build up and running with Guile-2.0, but,
I haven't flowed the Guile-2.0 support back to the next branch
of the mainline Serveez. In the process of testing out the hacked build,
I got distracted writing a webservice, and that's where my hacking has
been for the past couple of months.
=A0
But the only actual barrier to me submitting=A0a Guile-2.0
patchset is laziness and deciding what we're going to do
about binary blob types when compiling Serveez in the presence
of Guile-2.0.
=A0
-Mike