Re: progress to serveez-0.2

Julian Graham <[email protected]> Mon, 22 Oct 2012 18:10:11 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.network.serveez.devel
Message-ID <CANdC_RACtCCk8vmZP-RF0ozNFOpvw4CM04dXeeA7F6=QGvXWVg@mail.gmail.com>
--===============3511110867144815212==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d6471706616704ccad1e0b

--0016e6d6471706616704ccad1e0b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

hiya ttn,

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Don't bother.  I'll handle it.  Rather, i intend to, in the next few
> days; anyone who notices official repo =91next=92 idle after 2012-06-26
> please yell.
>

(yelling)


NB however: The 0.2.0 API is much smaller than the 0.1.7 API.  For this
> reason, i *strongly* encourage Julian to either post client code or an
> audit of the =91next=92 libserveez API wrt (against) the client code (bes=
t
> would be a build log), so as to catch and fix up any problems before the
> 0.2.0 release.
>

I am fairly parsimonious in my usage and will happily work around any
breakage I find.

Sorry for not replying to this thread sooner -- I was distracted by my work
on the next release of my Serveez-using project (
http://www.nongnu.org/gzochi/) and then by some real-life concerns. I still
would quite like to see a Serveez 0.2 release, not least of all so that I
can tell my non-existent users to build against an official release. Is
there anything I can do to help out?


Thanks again for your help,
Julian

--0016e6d6471706616704ccad1e0b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

hiya ttn,<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 7:21 AM=
, Thien-Thi Nguyen <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]"=
 target=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote cla=
ss=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;pa=
dding-left:1ex">
Don&#39;t bother. =A0I&#39;ll handle it. =A0Rather, i intend to, in the nex=
t few<br>
days; anyone who notices official repo =91next=92 idle after 2012-06-26<br>
please yell.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>(yelling)</div><div><br></=
div><div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 =
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">NB however: The 0.2.0 API=
 is much smaller than the 0.1.7 API. =A0For this<br>

reason, i *strongly* encourage Julian to either post client code or an<br>
audit of the =91next=92 libserveez API wrt (against) the client code (best<=
br>
would be a build log), so as to catch and fix up any problems before the<br=
>
0.2.0 release.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I am fairly parsimonious=
 in my usage and will happily work around any breakage I find.</div><div><b=
r></div><div>Sorry for not replying to this thread sooner -- I was distract=
ed by my work on the next release of my Serveez-using project (<a href=3D"h=
ttp://www.nongnu.org/gzochi/">http://www.nongnu.org/gzochi/</a>) and then b=
y some real-life concerns. I still would quite like to see a Serveez 0.2 re=
lease, not least of all so that I can tell my non-existent users to build a=
gainst an official release. Is there anything I can do to help out?</div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks again for your help,</div><div>Ju=
lian</div><div><br></div></div>

--0016e6d6471706616704ccad1e0b--


--===============3511110867144815212==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
dev-serveez mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dev-serveez

--===============3511110867144815212==--