Re: progress to serveez-0.2
Julian Graham <[email protected]> Mon, 22 Oct 2012 18:10:11 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.serveez.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANdC_RACtCCk8vmZP-RF0ozNFOpvw4CM04dXeeA7F6=QGvXWVg@mail.gmail.com> |
--===============3511110867144815212== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d6471706616704ccad1e0b --0016e6d6471706616704ccad1e0b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hiya ttn, On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote: > Don't bother. I'll handle it. Rather, i intend to, in the next few > days; anyone who notices official repo =91next=92 idle after 2012-06-26 > please yell. > (yelling) NB however: The 0.2.0 API is much smaller than the 0.1.7 API. For this > reason, i *strongly* encourage Julian to either post client code or an > audit of the =91next=92 libserveez API wrt (against) the client code (bes= t > would be a build log), so as to catch and fix up any problems before the > 0.2.0 release. > I am fairly parsimonious in my usage and will happily work around any breakage I find. Sorry for not replying to this thread sooner -- I was distracted by my work on the next release of my Serveez-using project ( http://www.nongnu.org/gzochi/) and then by some real-life concerns. I still would quite like to see a Serveez 0.2 release, not least of all so that I can tell my non-existent users to build against an official release. Is there anything I can do to help out? Thanks again for your help, Julian --0016e6d6471706616704ccad1e0b Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hiya ttn,<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 7:21 AM= , Thien-Thi Nguyen <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]"= target=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote cla= ss=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;pa= dding-left:1ex"> Don't bother. =A0I'll handle it. =A0Rather, i intend to, in the nex= t few<br> days; anyone who notices official repo =91next=92 idle after 2012-06-26<br> please yell.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>(yelling)</div><div><br></= div><div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 = .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">NB however: The 0.2.0 API= is much smaller than the 0.1.7 API. =A0For this<br> reason, i *strongly* encourage Julian to either post client code or an<br> audit of the =91next=92 libserveez API wrt (against) the client code (best<= br> would be a build log), so as to catch and fix up any problems before the<br= > 0.2.0 release.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I am fairly parsimonious= in my usage and will happily work around any breakage I find.</div><div><b= r></div><div>Sorry for not replying to this thread sooner -- I was distract= ed by my work on the next release of my Serveez-using project (<a href=3D"h= ttp://www.nongnu.org/gzochi/">http://www.nongnu.org/gzochi/</a>) and then b= y some real-life concerns. I still would quite like to see a Serveez 0.2 re= lease, not least of all so that I can tell my non-existent users to build a= gainst an official release. Is there anything I can do to help out?</div> <div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks again for your help,</div><div>Ju= lian</div><div><br></div></div> --0016e6d6471706616704ccad1e0b-- --===============3511110867144815212== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ dev-serveez mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dev-serveez --===============3511110867144815212==--