Re: [BUG SUB] silc-server 1.0.2 denial of service vulnerability - silc-server
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg-silc-QLrU/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.silc.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg-silc-QLrU/[email protected]> writes: > i've also posted an updated version of the debian package to the > normal place i've been serving my unofficial .debs: > > http://lair.fifthhorseman.net/~dkg/src/silc/ i've built backported packages for debian sarge as well now, available from the same place. The sha1sums for the sarge packages should be: faafd9208f9662f09ba42ca548e2acf67e7b6c5f silc-server_1.0.3-1~sarge_dkg1.diff.gz 73f573bc44f1b726cc0a9fe41280a7118d33baf6 silc-server_1.0.3-1~sarge_dkg1.dsc 324f37ab6a96b5a660fc8539bdd47af0f3d34f52 silc-server_1.0.3-1~sarge_dkg1_i386.build e885372df1520a099e27cedf0a90a3ee01620d0b silc-server_1.0.3-1~sarge_dkg1_i386.changes 25ac481d385bd298fbae0b8d9e754ee8f7e9aa40 silc-server_1.0.3-1~sarge_dkg1_i386.deb NOTE: i have tried (and am using) the debian etch packages. I have *not* tested the sarge packages at all, aside from building them. I'm always happy to hear feedback from folks who use the packages, whether you have problems with them or not. Regards, --dkg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD4DBQFF7xBViXTlFKVLY2URAiR/AJd27+w/PJhl4uWw2Q6ceHJkpkNCAJ42rIsN bxpjG4E5em2Eyg3/ckbdMw== =M4sT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________________________________ Info: https://lists.silcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/silc-announce Archive: https://lists.silcnet.org/pipermail/silc-announce FAQ: http://silcnet.org/support/faq/