SILC client 1.1.5 SHA256 sums wrong
Micah Anderson <[email protected]> Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:06:39 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.silc.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I recently was doing some work to update the Debian package for the newer releases of the various SILC utilities and found a disturbing difference between the sha256 sums posted on the website for the tarballs (both the .gz and .bz2) and the tarballs themselves: % sha256sum silc-client-1.1.5.tar.gz e36cdd3b822d0e64879113a021898c27c015ee8ef8fc303e5e693dc877634b94 silc-client-1.1.5.tar.gz % cat silc-client-1.1.5.tar.gz.sum 932e3e832e06df36b518b1a933bd3cff8cf628dc57ab7fd5f0b307a6e9f27d8c3583aa21607b6dd430250840e952def4726ac021e2a46f9207b20aa25ba7aed6 silc-client-1.1.5.tar.gz % sha256sum silc-client-1.1.5.tar.bz2 3282a9e6ace668ceff227a03be15f2dddb5ff90328ef00b605088ad987ef9373 silc-client-1.1.5.tar.bz2 % cat silc-client-1.1.5.tar.bz2.sum 2d201abdaf18232dad58e084aa08226151bb468ae6b88719b7b6edeea0780e12cc699c7d8f93603e9feeb71440aedea5589f82c0a7beb04aab2767adb6c12e54 silc-client-1.1.5.tar.bz2 After noticing the lengths were significantly different, I decided to try sha512, and it turns out these are actually sha512, not sha256, as advertised on the website[0]: % sha512sum silc-client-1.1.5.tar.gz 932e3e832e06df36b518b1a933bd3cff8cf628dc57ab7fd5f0b307a6e9f27d8c3583aa21607b6dd430250840e952def4726ac021e2a46f9207b20aa25ba7aed6 silc-client-1.1.5.tar.gz % sha512sum silc-client-1.1.5.tar.bz2 2d201abdaf18232dad58e084aa08226151bb468ae6b88719b7b6edeea0780e12cc699c7d8f93603e9feeb71440aedea5589f82c0a7beb04aab2767adb6c12e54 silc-client-1.1.5.tar.bz2 could this link be updated please? Thanks, Micah 0. http://silcnet.org/software/download/client/ _______________________________________________________________________ Info: https://lists.silcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/silc-announce Archive: https://lists.silcnet.org/pipermail/silc-announce FAQ: http://silcnet.org/support/faq/