Antwort: Re: sipgate problem workaround

[email protected] Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:19:18 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.network.siproxd
Message-ID <OFB4655489.621EE112-ONC1256F8E.0032F29C-C1256F8E.003334A0@mw-eb.de>
I have tried call out through sipgate again. It also works for me now. 
Sometimes wonder happen.

Mathias Wohlfarth EDV-Beratung
Thomas-Mann-Str.1
53111 Bonn
Tel.    0172 / 53 45 591
        01801 / 777 555 33 01
Fax     0228 / 9469181
Email   [email protected]




Peter Koellner <[email protected]>
Gesendet von: siproxd-users-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
17.01.2005 20:39
Bitte antworten an siproxd-users
 
        An:     [email protected]
        Kopie: 
        Thema:  Re: [Siproxd-users] sipgate problem workaround


On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Thomas Ries wrote:

> I can just try to guess what code lines you are talking about (a diff
> might have been better). IF (as I assume) the code you commented out
> lies in the function msg_make_template_reply() this would make me
> wonder, BECAUSE this function is solely used for locally processed
> requests (phone -> siproxd) and not requests directed to the provider
> (phone -> siproxd -> sipgate). A request beeing processed there will
> never be sent to the outside world.

strange... i wonder if they actually changed their authentication scheme
while i tried out changes on the code...

argghhh... now it works with the original source, so they might have 
actually changed something!!!!!

> So I would be very interested in details what you found out about
> sipgate and using VIA headers for authentication. Once the problem is
> fully understood, it should be possible to provide a
> "clean" fix/workaround that does not break other things.

well, basically the sipgate support told me that they used the VIA header
for authentication purposes and that this would not work because
siproxd added another VIA header. so I wrote them back that they should
simply check all via headers in the queue instead of the first one, but 
did not get an answer. So I guess they changed something today, and now 
it works with the regular siproxd, and it was pure coincidence that I was
experimenting with changing the source code today...

-- 
peter koellner <[email protected]>


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Siproxd-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/siproxd-users