Re: NNTP servers
"Monique Y. Mudama" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.slrn.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2005-12-20, Hans-Christoph Wirth penned: > Marc Tardif writes: >> >> However, I tend to use another email address to prevent spammers >> from automatically racking my email address. For example, I tend to >> use [email protected]. Isn't that a common practice? Why >> would news.individual.net care so much about the From address? > > It is common practice to not use faked addresses: It's fairly common practice to use faked addresses. Whether or not it's the best practice is another question. > 1. It's not 100% safe for the reader how to reconstruct the > "correct" address, or whether it should be corrected at all I don't see the problem here. The author can provide instructions in the body of the email for un-munging the address. Or not, if they really don't care if anyone can figure it out. > 2. There is no safe way for the writer to construct an email address > which can be guaranteed to not ever becoming a valid address A lot of people have their own domains. They can be sure that a munged email address using their own domain won't go to another user. > 3. It is uncomfortable for the replying person, who just decided to > take the time and write an answer to a posting, to do more than > pressing the reply key Sounds good to me! They should be following up in the newsgroup, anyway, in the vast majority of cases. I want people to think long and hard before emailing me personally because of a newsgroup posting. > 4. If the unchanged address is used, this creates additional effort > for third parties (postmasters of the faked domains or people owning > the apprently invalid address) and for the replying person (who must > resend the bounced mail, at which time it is probably not trivial to > see the particular posting again in order to make a better guess on > the address). I'm sympathetic to your argument about extra work for third parties. As I've mentioned, I want the replying person to have to think about whether or not they really want to reply to me personally, and I would prefer that they give up and post to the group. For the record, my address is actually valid, but I purposely chose a username that looks like it might be invalid. It reduces the number of personal mails I get from newsgroups dramatically, which is just the way I like it. -- monique Ask smart questions, get good answers: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click