Re: automake 1.10 and autoconf 2.61 are required for cvs compilation

* Peter J Ross ([email protected]) wrote [Wed, 070801 19:45]:

> But the problems other people have when compiling slrn from CVS
> will disappear if there's a .pl2 or 1.0-rc1 release, preferably
> with your charset patch included.

> The only reason non-developers like me are using CVS code is that
> there are fixes available in CVS for .pl1 problems.

To ease the pain a little bit, I put a tarball of the .pl2 CVS
version on the foory website. The tarball was created with "make
dist", so there should be no problems with all the autoconf and
automake issues.

To make "make dist" work I had to replace the line "src/chmap.c"
with "src/charset.c" in po/POTFILES.in. I think this is the
reason, why the debian tarball of .pl2 is broken as "make dist"
did not work. 

> If Thomas (Schultz, not Wiegner) isn't too busy, I'd really
> like to see a .pl2 release soon... and maybe a 1.0 before the
> end of 2007?

This would be really nice.

 Thomas

-- 
slrn charset patches: http://www.foory.de/thw/slrn/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/