Re: 0.9.9 release soon?
Peter J Ross <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.slrn.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday 08 February 2008 03:58:52 John E. Davis wrote: > Peter J Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > > Apart from the documentation being in need of some work (which would be a > > problem for 1.0 or even 0.10, but surely not for 0.9.9), is there > > anything preventing a 0.9.9 release soon, or even today? > > I would appreciate it if someone were to update the .sgml version of > the manual to reflect the changes in 0.9.9. I am not sure where the > sgml is located. It's here: <http://slrn.cvs.sourceforge.net/slrn/manual/> Judging by the questions I see in news.software.readers, nobody but me reads the manual anyway. :-) > Also, what about slrnpull? I have not used nor tested it since I took > over from Thomas. I get the feeling that many people have moved on to > using leafnode. For these reasons, I feel that slrnpull should not be > included in the 0.9.9 release. Leafnode is another program that's long overdue for a release. I use leafnode and have no interest in slrnpull, but others may want slrnpull to be maintained. Asking for feedback in news.software.readers on the idea of droppng slrnpull development might or might not be useful. It would be interestng to see if slrn pre0.9.9 works with the separate Debian package of slrnpull (currently 0.9.8.1pl1). It's possible that the two programs could be separated. > Finally, www.slrn.org should be updated. So should <http://slrn.sourceforge.net/>, which is currently so completely identical to <http://www.slrn.org> that I suspect one is a mirror of the other. At the very least, the obsolete reference to CVS sources on <http://slrn.sourceforge.net/patches/> should be updated; I was unaware that there existed a Subversion repository until you mentioned it on Usenet. Change <a href="http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=7768">public CVS</a> to <a href="http://sourceforge.net/svn/?group_id=7768">public SVN</a> and there will be far fewer complaints about slrn being "broken". -- PJR :-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/