Re: Crossposts warning revisited.....

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:57:16AM +1000, andrew wrote:

> Is Sven's suggestion of:
> Crosspost. "(F)ollowup-To", Post to (a)ll groups/(t)his group only,(C)ancel?
> easier to understand than the current:
> Crossposting. Set "Followup-To", Post to all groups / this group only,Cancel?

I guess actions speak louder than words: I have patched my own copy to
achieve Sven's wording and it is a huge improvement in my eyes. I
attach the patch to this email for more skilled people to consider.

          Andrew

-- 
http://www.andrews-corner.org

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone

Index: src/art.c
===================================================================
--- src/art.c	(revision 270)
+++ src/art.c	(working copy)
@@ -3356,7 +3356,7 @@
         char *responses=_("fFaAtTcC");
 	if (strlen (responses) != 8)
 	  responses = "";
-	rsp = slrn_get_response ("fFaAtTcC", responses, _("Crossposting. Set \"\001Followup-To\", Post to \001all groups / \001this group only, \001Cancel?"));
+	rsp = slrn_get_response ("fFaAtTcC", responses, _("Crosspost: \"\001(F)ollowup-To\", Post to \001(a)ll groups / \001(t)his group only, \001(C)ancel?"));
 	rsp = slrn_map_translated_char ("fFaAtTcC", responses, rsp) | 0x20;
 	switch (rsp)
 	  {