Re: Mail reply or forward
Peter J Ross <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.slrn.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sunday 06 July 2008 10:50:52 Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > I have been playing with "r" and "F" to reply to a poster by email or > forward a message by email. It brings up mutt OK. I have muutt specified > in .slrnrc. However, it gives some duplicate headers in the body of the > message (i.e after a blank line). Should this happen? No, that shouldn't happen. What are the relevant parts of your slrnrc? The standard advice for using slrn with mutt is here: <http://slrn.sourceforge.net/manual/slrn-manual-6.html#mail_editor_is_mua> It would be easier to solve your problem if you specified the versions of slrn and mutt that you're using. It's also possible that your editor configuration is faulty. > I also played around with slrn-mua.sh which I had used about 7 years ago > on a different system - unix, I now use cygwin for mutt and slrn on a > laptop. Are there still any advantages in using that, compared with the > slrn support directly for reply and forward? I've never heard of "slrn-mua.sh", and Google seems not to have heard of it too. It sounds interesting. > Keep up the good work. I had a time away from slrn. It is good to be > back. Welcome back. slrn is enjoying a renascence. And there *is* going to be a 0.9.9 release *very* soon, I hope. -- PJR :-) Updated and experimental documentation for slrn 0.9.9 and beyond: <http://slrn-doc.sourceforge.net> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08