Re: custom_headers ignored in followup_hook

Michael Uplawski <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Oct 2015 07:55:56 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.network.slrn.user
Organization	Souris Libre, Saint-Patric e-Du-Désert, France
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Roger that.

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 02:12:57PM -0400, John E. Davis wrote:
> Michael Uplawski <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The post_hook works as wanted, while in the followup_hook the
> > *custom_header setting is ignored*!
> 
> For followups, "followup_custom_headers" is used, not "custom_headers".

Okay, I see.

But allow me a question. While I understand the need for additional
rules, is there also an explanation for omitting the “already defined”
custom_headers in follow-ups? I do not claim my use of the feature
to be “typical” or my questions of general interest, but I do all the
same believe, that the conflict between these options will be recurring,
albeit easily mastered by the more experienced users.

My English is too rusty to shorten those mails but I omitted preface and
epilogue.

Michael
-- 
ATTN! New Key!
GnuPG brainpoolP512r1/5C2A258D 2015-10-02 [expires: 2017-10-01]
Michael Uplawski <[email protected]>
fingerprint: 2A44 09D4 54B4 EBD2 90DA  0B2D E8B8 0614 5C2A 258D
sub   brainpoolP512r1/53461AFA 2015-10-02 [expires: 2017-10-01]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 303 B)