Re: Best working solutuion for mime? macro? etc.
Guido Berhoerster <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:37:51 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.slrn.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20160610093750.GA10200@hal> |
Hi, * Oliver Briscbois <[email protected]> [2016-06-10 03:45]: > Hi all. > > I'm a new user of slrn and I'd like to ask if someone reading this would > point me in the best direction for a solution to mime posts recieved in > slrn. > > It could be a simple as switching on a default marco. I've been fidling > with slrnmime.sl from 2010. > > What are you all using, that works for you? > > Can anyone verify signatures, either GPG/OPENSSL, when posted as mime > messages? > > Any reply is appreciated. Please set me off looking in the right > direction. the MIME macro that comes with slrn isn't very useful with real-world messages as e.g. found on gmane.org. I've forked and improved it some time ago so it handles arbitrarily numbers of and nested parts of message/rfc822, multipart/alternative, multipart/mixed, multipart/digest, multipart/related, and multipart/signed content type, has correct mailcap support and offers a menu for saving each part. Output is intentionally quite similar to mutt, I've been using it for ~3 years and it handles pretty much anything I've encountered on gmane. The only thing it doesn't do is veryfing signatures or decoding GPG/SMIME because I have had no need for it. You can find it at: https://code.guido-berhoerster.org/addons/slrn-macros/slrn-mime-support-macro/ -- Guido Berhoerster ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports. https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e