Re: RESOLVED - Issue with Spread going silent
Yair Amir <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.spread.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This would be a good idea. We have quite a bit of code (other than Spread) that uses this scatter gather scheme. I suspect almost everyone is using 64-bits - all our stuff is, but I never encountered this problem myself. Apparently only on FreeBSD and AMD chips (?) Cheers, :) Yair. On 11/7/10 4:42 PM, Luke Marsden wrote: > Hi Mel, > > Thank you!! Changing the header file as per > http://lists.spread.org/pipermail/spread-users/2010-July/004316.html > seems to have done the trick. Clusters of two now join together with a > third even while our Python daemon is running and pumping data through > Spread. > > Can't express how grateful I am for this, this was a real show-stopper > for the launch of our beta programme, which is this week! > > Yair, I think this might warrant a point release, you've probably got a > lot of 64-bit users who could get bitten by this bug. Also, thank you > for your kind assistance today :-) >