Re: Question about spread v4.1

John Robinson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.spread.user
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On 02/18/2011 12:03 PM, John Schultz wrote:
> Spread will never be able to compete with native UDP or TCP when it comes to throughput in ultra fast networks because it acts as a user-level middle man and consequently has more OS context switches in the messaging path and higher CPU load.  I also don't believe Spread has ever been extensively profiled to optimize its computational hot spots.  Spread's primary concern is about giving powerful semantics to users that makes distributed programming easier.  Performance in throughput and latency are very important, but they are not the primary goal of Spread.

Has anyone ever contemplated incorporating spread into the kernel?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.