Re: "Connected closed by Spread" on receiving

Il giorno 20 aprile 2012 21:28, John Schultz
<[email protected]>ha scritto:
>
>
> Maybe if you tell us more about your Spread version and OS environments
> that might shed some more light?
>

Of course, I completely forgot. I'm using the Spread binary release version
4.0.0 and the OS is a 64 bit Chakra GNU/Linux installation with kernel v3.2
(it's the same for both applications).

Lisa


>
> Cheers!
>
> -----
> John Lane Schultz
> Spread Concepts LLC
> Phn: 301 830 8100
> Cell: 443 838 2200
>
> On Apr 20, 2012, at 3:10 PM, Lisa Vitolo wrote:
>
> Yes, after the sender sends the first message it waits for input from the
> user, while SP_disconnect is called only when it terminates.
> By the way, after SP_multicast returns with success isn't the sender able
> to close the connection without problems anyway?
>
> About the receiving mailbox, it's closed only when a SIGINT signal arrives.
>
> Thanks for your patience :)
>
> Il giorno 20 aprile 2012 20:56, John Schultz <[email protected]>
> ha scritto:
> That is strange.  The daemon's OS is claiming that the receiving client's
> socket was closed abruptly for some reason.
>
> Are you 100% sure that the mailbox you are receiving on couldn't be closed
> somehow (e.g. - by the sender calling SP_disconnect)?
>
> Cheers!
>
> -----
> John Lane Schultz
> Spread Concepts LLC
> Phn: 301 830 8100
> Cell: 443 838 2200
>
> On Apr 20, 2012, at 2:35 PM, Lisa Vitolo wrote:
>
> Sorry! Gmail failed me and sent the message privately :D I'll repeat it
> here.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. It prints more useful debug messages now, but I
> still can't figure out what they really mean.
>
> - The receiver connects:
> Sess_accept: set sndbuf/rcvbuf to 204800
> Setting TCP_NODELAY on socket 9
> Sess_recv_client_auth: Client requested NULL type authentication
> Sess_session_authorized: Accepting from 127.0.0.1 with private name get on
> mailbox 9
> Sess_read: Message has type field 0x80010080
> Sess_read: queueing message of type 8 with len 0 to the protocol <-- is
> "len 0" here the issue?
>
> - The sender connects:
> Sess_accept: set sndbuf/rcvbuf to 204800
> Setting TCP_NODELAY on socket 10
> Sess_recv_client_auth: Client requested NULL type authentication
> Sess_session_authorized: Accepting from 127.0.0.1 with private name send
> on mailbox 10
>
> - The sender sends the message:
> Sess_read: Message has type field 0x80000081
> Sess_read: queueing message of type 2 with len 0 to the protocol
> Sess_read: Message has type field 0x800000a0
> Sess_read: queueing message of type 16 with len 0 to the protocol
> Sess_read: failed receiving header on session 9: ret -1: error: Connection
> reset by peer
> Sess_kill: killing session get ( mailbox 9 )
>
> Cheers,
> Lisa
>
> Il giorno 20 aprile 2012 20:17, John Schultz <[email protected]>
> ha scritto:
>
> What does the daemon output around the time your receiver is disconnected?
>
> If nothing, then I would add the SESSION flag to your daemon's DebugFlags
> in its configuration file and re-run to try to see why the daemon is
> closing your receiver.
>
> Cheers!
>
> -----
> John Lane Schultz
> Spread Concepts LLC
> Phn: 301 830 8100
> Cell: 443 838 2200
>
>
> --
> They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so
> bad as a lot of ignorance.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spread-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.spread.org/mailman/listinfo/spread-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spread-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.spread.org/mailman/listinfo/spread-users
>
>
>
>
> --
> They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so
> bad as a lot of ignorance.
> _______________________________________________
> Spread-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.spread.org/mailman/listinfo/spread-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spread-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.spread.org/mailman/listinfo/spread-users
>
>


-- 
They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so
bad as a lot of ignorance.

_______________________________________________
Spread-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.spread.org/mailman/listinfo/spread-users