Re: "Connected closed by Spread" on receiving

Woops!  Scratch that scratch!  I was right the first time!  The file I want you to edit is daemon/scatter.h

Cheers!

-----
John Lane Schultz
Spread Concepts LLC
Phn: 301 830 8100
Cell: 443 838 2200

On Apr 20, 2012, at 3:56 PM, John Schultz wrote:

Sorry, I meant util/scatter.h

Cheers!

-----
John Lane Schultz
Spread Concepts LLC
Phn: 301 830 8100
Cell: 443 838 2200

On Apr 20, 2012, at 3:53 PM, John Schultz wrote:

Do me a favor: edit daemon/scatter.h and replace all the "int" types with "size_t" within the structures, completely rebuild everything and retry your test.  You may be getting bitten by a known 64b bug.

Cheers!

-----
John Lane Schultz
Spread Concepts LLC
Phn: 301 830 8100
Cell: 443 838 2200

On Apr 20, 2012, at 3:36 PM, Lisa Vitolo wrote:



Il giorno 20 aprile 2012 21:28, John Schultz <[email protected]> ha scritto:

Maybe if you tell us more about your Spread version and OS environments that might shed some more light?

Of course, I completely forgot. I'm using the Spread binary release version 4.0.0 and the OS is a 64 bit Chakra GNU/Linux installation with kernel v3.2 (it's the same for both applications).

Lisa


Cheers!

-----
John Lane Schultz
Spread Concepts LLC
Phn: 301 830 8100
Cell: 443 838 2200

On Apr 20, 2012, at 3:10 PM, Lisa Vitolo wrote:

Yes, after the sender sends the first message it waits for input from the user, while SP_disconnect is called only when it terminates.
By the way, after SP_multicast returns with success isn't the sender able to close the connection without problems anyway?

About the receiving mailbox, it's closed only when a SIGINT signal arrives.

Thanks for your patience :)

Il giorno 20 aprile 2012 20:56, John Schultz <[email protected]> ha scritto:
That is strange.  The daemon's OS is claiming that the receiving client's socket was closed abruptly for some reason.

Are you 100% sure that the mailbox you are receiving on couldn't be closed somehow (e.g. - by the sender calling SP_disconnect)?

Cheers!

-----
John Lane Schultz
Spread Concepts LLC
Phn: 301 830 8100
Cell: 443 838 2200

On Apr 20, 2012, at 2:35 PM, Lisa Vitolo wrote:

Sorry! Gmail failed me and sent the message privately :D I'll repeat it here.

Thanks for the suggestion. It prints more useful debug messages now, but I still can't figure out what they really mean.

- The receiver connects:
Sess_accept: set sndbuf/rcvbuf to 204800
Setting TCP_NODELAY on socket 9
Sess_recv_client_auth: Client requested NULL type authentication
Sess_session_authorized: Accepting from 127.0.0.1 with private name get on mailbox 9
Sess_read: Message has type field 0x80010080
Sess_read: queueing message of type 8 with len 0 to the protocol <-- is "len 0" here the issue?

- The sender connects:
Sess_accept: set sndbuf/rcvbuf to 204800
Setting TCP_NODELAY on socket 10
Sess_recv_client_auth: Client requested NULL type authentication
Sess_session_authorized: Accepting from 127.0.0.1 with private name send on mailbox 10

- The sender sends the message:
Sess_read: Message has type field 0x80000081
Sess_read: queueing message of type 2 with len 0 to the protocol
Sess_read: Message has type field 0x800000a0
Sess_read: queueing message of type 16 with len 0 to the protocol
Sess_read: failed receiving header on session 9: ret -1: error: Connection reset by peer
Sess_kill: killing session get ( mailbox 9 )

Cheers,
Lisa

Il giorno 20 aprile 2012 20:17, John Schultz <[email protected]> ha scritto:

What does the daemon output around the time your receiver is disconnected?

If nothing, then I would add the SESSION flag to your daemon's DebugFlags in its configuration file and re-run to try to see why the daemon is closing your receiver.

Cheers!

-----
John Lane Schultz
Spread Concepts LLC
Phn: 301 830 8100
Cell: 443 838 2200


--
They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance.

_______________________________________________
Spread-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.spread.org/mailman/listinfo/spread-users


_______________________________________________
Spread-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.spread.org/mailman/listinfo/spread-users




--
They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance.
_______________________________________________
Spread-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.spread.org/mailman/listinfo/spread-users


_______________________________________________
Spread-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.spread.org/mailman/listinfo/spread-users




-- 
They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance.
_______________________________________________
Spread-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.spread.org/mailman/listinfo/spread-users

_______________________________________________
Spread-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.spread.org/mailman/listinfo/spread-users

_______________________________________________
Spread-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.spread.org/mailman/listinfo/spread-users

_______________________________________________
Spread-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.spread.org/mailman/listinfo/spread-users