Re: port limitation to int16

Hi

On 08/08/2013 04:40 PM, John Schultz wrote:
> Looks like we had roughly the same idea! :)
> 
> I think changing the underlying types that hold ports is probably safer because if somewhere someone does:
> 
> int16u port;
> 
> ...
> 
> printf("%d", port);
> 
> I think C does the right thing.  

Thanks for the patch.

Right, I missed the two other definitions of port. It works well now.

Will there be a maintenance release including this patch?

Cheers,
Johannes

_______________________________________________
Spread-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.spread.org/mailman/listinfo/spread-users

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlIDtgYACgkQBFcR5UV/ccJ3ewCgui6geuF5MMwvRk/QJ2f5q34k
aS8AnRIcUFVhZBHAe4EQSMjNMRlSfm3d
=/wrq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----