Re: [PATCH] Address already in use (98) when binding to localhost
Christian Kujau <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.stunnel.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018, Michał Trojnara wrote: > Can you try: > https://www.stunnel.org/downloads/beta/stunnel-5.45b2.tar.gz Yes, this works. Stunnel comes up just fine w/o errors and binds to both the IPv4 and IPv6 address of "localhost": $ stunnel-5.45b2 ~/stunnel.test 2018.02.08 19:36:11 LOG5[ui]: stunnel 5.45 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu platform 2018.02.08 19:36:11 LOG5[ui]: Compiled/running with OpenSSL 1.1.0g-fips 2 Nov 2017 2018.02.08 19:36:11 LOG5[ui]: Threading:PTHREAD Sockets:POLL,IPv6 TLS:ENGINE,FIPS,OCSP,PSK,SNI Auth:LIBWRAP 2018.02.08 19:36:11 LOG5[ui]: Reading configuration from file /home/christian/stunnel.test 2018.02.08 19:36:11 LOG5[ui]: UTF-8 byte order mark not detected 2018.02.08 19:36:11 LOG5[ui]: FIPS mode disabled 2018.02.08 19:36:11 LOG4[ui]: Service [test] needs authentication to prevent MITM attacks 2018.02.08 19:36:11 LOG5[ui]: Configuration successful $ grep -A4 ^\\[ ~/stunnel.test [test] client = yes protocol = smtp accept = localhost:12345 connect = localhost:2025 > My main code repository is private. There is also a public repository > based on official releases, but I guess this wasn't the point of your > question. https://github.com/mtrojnar/stunnel Hm, yeah. I was indeed look for a -development tree to follow small changes more easily, w/o having to fetch whole tarballs. But maybe I'm just not used to shuffling tarballs around anymore, like one used to do before the age of Git :-) Anyway, thanks for fixing this, and for maintaining stunnel. Christian. -- BOFH excuse #231: We had to turn off that service to comply with the CDA Bill. _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list [email protected] https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users