Re: Loss of ability to use Stunnel-Blat, and a solution

Peter Pentchev <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.stunnel.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 09:15:39AM +0200, Flo Rance wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Click on your avatar, then Google Account, then Sign-In & Security. At the
> bottom of the page, there's "Allow less secure apps".
> 
> You can't choose which app is a less secure app, because this option may be
> understood as "re-enabling Basic Authentication" which means "plain-text
> password authentication".
> 
> By default, Gmail only allows Oauth authentication.

<off-topic rant... SCNR>

Yeah, well, wouldn't it be nice if only we had a system that would allow
us to grant (possibly limited) access to specific applications by, say,
issuing them a little authentication something that they could present
to the authorities... we might even call it a "ticket"... but of course,
not everything with access should be able to issue tickets, so we may
have a ticket-granting ticket and a normal access ticket...

...yeah, wouldn't it be nice...

</rant>

Sometimes I do feel like an old-timer...

G'luck,
Peter

> Regards,
> Flo
> 
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 7:55 PM, Roger Bohl <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Early in 2018, around the time when I upgraded my system to Windows 10,
> > the Stunnel and Blat files that had worked fine with my Vista PC would not
> > work with the new PC.  However, the "bug" turned out to be unrelated to the
> > change in operating systems, but rather an "upgrade" to Gmail:
> > Coincidentally, about that time, Gmail evidently decided to stop accepting
> > e-mails from apps deemed "a less secure app", including Stunnel-Blat, with
> > Blat then displaying messages:
> >
> > *** Warning ***  The SMTP server did not accept Auth PLAIN value.
> > *** Warning ***  Are your login userid and password correct?
> > *** Warning ***  The SMTP server did not accept Auth LOGIN PASSWD value.
> >
> > Only a failure message sent to my "backup e-mail address" led me to
> > explore this as a possible cause for what I had thought was, but turned out
> > not to be, a Stunnel-Blat problem.  Gmail has an option to suppress this
> > heightened security feature, and when I activated this option, my
> > Stunnel-Blat tools immediately began to function as intended.
> >
> >
> > While I was at first able to enable Gmail to "Allow access from "less
> > secure accounts," I have been unable to get through Gmail options
> > consistently to turn this on and off and share this info with others.  (I
> > would welcome instructions that work consistently.)
> >
> > I would also welcome guidance on how to include Stunnel-Blat as a specific
> > alllowed app, without having to enable Gmail to enable *all* "less secure
> > apps"
> >
> > Roger Bohl

-- 
Peter Pentchev  roam@{ringlet.net,debian.org,FreeBSD.org} [email protected]
PGP key:        http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115  C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13

_______________________________________________
stunnel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=xfIA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.