Re: older browsers, stunnel and privoxy

Flo Rance <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.stunnel.user
Message-ID <CAHogYcUZF2-boWDZG6k7MA6EaAc6TMn6vsOEjAYqwMGYHz3uUA@mail.gmail.com>
Sorry I didn't read it correctly. I don't think this is something stunnel
can handle.

Regards,
Flo

On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 9:31 PM kovacs janos <[email protected]>
wrote:

> thank you for  the reply,
> its the address and port where privoxy listens for requests.
> from the config file:
> "#  4.1. listen-address
> #  ====================
> #
> #  Specifies:
> #
> #      The IP address and TCP port on which Privoxy will listen for
> #      client requests."
> and under it:
>
> listen-address  127.0.0.1:8118
>
> On 12/3/18, Flo Rance <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It's not clear in your description what is running on 8118 local port.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Flo
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 2:40 PM kovacs janos <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> sorry to bother,
> >> im trying to make older browsers be able to display TLS 1.1 and TLS 1.2
> >> sites.
> >> i heard stunnel cant be configured to always forward to the current
> >> site address dynamically, thats why i would use privoxy.
> >> the browser is configured to send to:
> >> 127.0.0.1  443
> >>
> >> stunnel config has this at the end:
> >> [Tunnel_in]
> >> client = yes
> >> accept = 127.0.0.1:443
> >> connect = 127.0.0.1:8118
> >> verifyChain = yes
> >> CAfile = ca-certs.pem
> >> checkHost = localhost
> >>
> >> 127.0.0.1:8118 is the privoxy address.
> >> this is what stunnel writes:
> >> LOG5[main]: Configuration successful
> >> LOG5[0]: Service [Tunnel_in] accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:3261
> >> LOG5[0]: s_connect: connected 127.0.0.1:8118
> >> LOG5[0]: Service [Tunnel_in] connected remote server from
> 127.0.0.1:3262
> >>
> >> and the browser infinitely loads, and never loads anything or leaves the
> >> page.
> >> if i remove the last 3 lines, its the same just with this line added:
> >> LOG4[main]: Service [Tunnel_in] needs authentication to prevent MITM
> >> attacks
> >>
> >> but it doesnt give an error or anything.
> >>
> >> with a configuration like:
> >> [Tunnel_out]
> >> client = no
> >> accept = 127.0.0.1:443
> >> connect = 127.0.0.1:8118
> >> cert = stunnel.pem
> >>
> >> this is what it gives:
> >> LOG5[3]: Service [Tunnel_out] accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:3294
> >> LOG3[3]: SSL_accept: 1407609B: error:1407609B:SSL
> >> routines:SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:https proxy request
> >> LOG5[3]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to
> >> socket
> >>
> >> and browser gives a server not found error immediately. im not even
> >> sure if i should use client or server configuration in a case like
> >> this, but none of them works anyway. all i would need is for my
> >> browser to get the pages decrypted, or at least in less than TLS1.1.
> >> like how on newipnow.com i can access sites with any encryption, since
> >> they are sent to the browser without encryption. the browser just
> >> gives an "unencrypted tunnel" warning, which is how i found stunnel,
> >> and which is exactly what i need, just locally.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> stunnel-users mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
> >>
> >
>

_______________________________________________
stunnel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.