Re: older browsers, stunnel and privoxy

kovacs janos <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.stunnel.user
Message-ID <CAOchpkrRqVW4Rq80gjjbARODEL5y2JEHSzYA3oDrh=6jFb+c0A@mail.gmail.com>
if stunnel can only accept from and forward to one address, cant that
be went around by setting a dynamic address proxy on both sides of
stunnel? like:
proxy - stunnel - proxy

although i havent been able to connect to even a single website, but i
didnt try with specifically the IP

On 12/7/18, yyy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "kovacs janos" <[email protected]>
> To: "Flo Rance" <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2018 2:30 AM
> Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] older browsers, stunnel and privoxy
>
>
>> now im really not sure, since the wikipedia page on stunnel also
>> describes the program doing exactly what i need in the Example
>> scenario section:
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stunnel#Example_scenario
>>
>> "Network traffic from the client initially passes over SSL to the
>> stunnel application, which transparently encrypts/decrypts traffic and
>> forwards unsecured traffic to port 25 locally. The mail server sees a
>> non-SSL mail client. "
>>
>> only difference is, i need it to forward "unsecured traffic" to my
>> browser client, not a server. are you all sure its really not
>> possible?
>>
> It is possible with the same limitiations as with server case.
> In case of server, there is one server, which accepts incoming connections
> (unencrypted) and stunnel accepts unencrypted
> connections for that (one) server and decrypts and forwards them. There is
> only one server, which gets connected by stunnel.
>
> In case of client (browser), for each remote (https) server to be connected
> to, stunnnel config file will need an entry;
> in browser it will not be possible to use DNS names (all servers will have
> to be addressed as 127.0.0.1:someport
> where "someport", is port assigned in stunnel conf server entry accept
> statement), so most links in webpages will not work.
> It may be feasible for small number of servers, which does not links any
> external resources.
>
> _______________________________________________
> stunnel-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
>
_______________________________________________
stunnel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.