Re: RFC: myPublicFeeds.opml

"Dave Winer" <dave-rH/ioLL7x7RWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.syndication.discuss
Organization Berkman Center, Harvard Law School
Message-ID <179c01c39250$117c8cc0$6401a8c0@murphy3>
This is addressed in the Q&A.

http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/stories/storyReader$310#whyNotUseALinkElem
entInstead

Dave


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Kearney" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 8:21 AM
Subject: Re: [syndication] RFC: myPublicFeeds.opml


> > You say it "isn't a good idea" and don't explain why.
>
> But explain why it is a good idea.  There's already a well-established
practice
> of using <link> tags.  Why not make use of this already well engineered
idea?
> Why reinvent it?
>
> > TBL says it isn't a good idea because the owner of the site owns the
> > namespace, which makes sense, but robots.txt et al already offer
features
> > based on common file names.
>
> So your rationale is because something else does a bad job it's fine to go
> along?
>
> > TBL is bucking a long-term trend here. Operating systems have always had
> > known locations for special configuration files.
>
> Or are these 'old habits that are hard to break'.  Old dogs often can't
learn
> new tricks.
>
> > Unless the architecture anticipates this, and has a single config file
that
> > can be used by multiple applications (the Registry on Windows, for
example)
> > then you end up with multiple files. Not much mystery to this. Even then
> > it's the same solution, just moved down one level.
>
> And everyone widely regards things like the registry as being a bad idea.
You
> don't even use it for your own programs (frontier, radio) so why force it
on
> others?
>
> > You could argue that the user owns all namespaces, not just Web space,
and
> > then poof all software would disappear.
>
> You can try all sorts of silly and dismissive arguments.  They just don't
work,
> however.
>
> > Joe, it's a hopeless argument. There have to be some config files. Have
to
> > be. Not an option. Try to get rid of them is like trying to boil the
ocean.
>
> Sure, bully everyone into thinking your half-baked idea is the 'one true,
right
> one'.  Puh-leeze.
>
> > PS: Bill Kearney thinks I'm a jerk and an idiot and should be outlawed
or
> > run out of town or strung up on a tree. Danny Ayers thinks everything
should
> > be in RDF. Maybe they can help themselves and save us the trouble of yet
> > another recital of their favorite memes. Or not. ;->
>
> No, I think you're an abusive asshole.  But that's not germane to the
argument.
>
> The idea of having a predictable mechanism for site-wide (or
'context-wide')
> discovery is a /great/ idea, one many people have proposed before.  It's
the
> idea of forcing a fixed URL onto the situation, coupled with using a bad
format,
> that's the problem.
>
> -Bill Kearney
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>


 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.