Re: RFC: myPublicFeeds.opml
"Dave Winer" <dave-rH/ioLL7x7RWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.syndication.discuss |
|---|---|
| Organization | Berkman Center, Harvard Law School |
| Message-ID | <179c01c39250$117c8cc0$6401a8c0@murphy3> |
This is addressed in the Q&A. http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/stories/storyReader$310#whyNotUseALinkElem entInstead Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Kearney" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 8:21 AM Subject: Re: [syndication] RFC: myPublicFeeds.opml > > You say it "isn't a good idea" and don't explain why. > > But explain why it is a good idea. There's already a well-established practice > of using <link> tags. Why not make use of this already well engineered idea? > Why reinvent it? > > > TBL says it isn't a good idea because the owner of the site owns the > > namespace, which makes sense, but robots.txt et al already offer features > > based on common file names. > > So your rationale is because something else does a bad job it's fine to go > along? > > > TBL is bucking a long-term trend here. Operating systems have always had > > known locations for special configuration files. > > Or are these 'old habits that are hard to break'. Old dogs often can't learn > new tricks. > > > Unless the architecture anticipates this, and has a single config file that > > can be used by multiple applications (the Registry on Windows, for example) > > then you end up with multiple files. Not much mystery to this. Even then > > it's the same solution, just moved down one level. > > And everyone widely regards things like the registry as being a bad idea. You > don't even use it for your own programs (frontier, radio) so why force it on > others? > > > You could argue that the user owns all namespaces, not just Web space, and > > then poof all software would disappear. > > You can try all sorts of silly and dismissive arguments. They just don't work, > however. > > > Joe, it's a hopeless argument. There have to be some config files. Have to > > be. Not an option. Try to get rid of them is like trying to boil the ocean. > > Sure, bully everyone into thinking your half-baked idea is the 'one true, right > one'. Puh-leeze. > > > PS: Bill Kearney thinks I'm a jerk and an idiot and should be outlawed or > > run out of town or strung up on a tree. Danny Ayers thinks everything should > > be in RDF. Maybe they can help themselves and save us the trouble of yet > > another recital of their favorite memes. Or not. ;-> > > No, I think you're an abusive asshole. But that's not germane to the argument. > > The idea of having a predictable mechanism for site-wide (or 'context-wide') > discovery is a /great/ idea, one many people have proposed before. It's the > idea of forcing a fixed URL onto the situation, coupled with using a bad format, > that's the problem. > > -Bill Kearney > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/