Re: shared feed lists

Jeremy Zawodny <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.syndication.discuss
Message-ID <20031014154249.GD585@thermal>
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 09:42:42AM -0400, Bill Kearney wrote:
> 
> Why is using a <head> section <link> tag not sufficient?

It is sufficient if one has the ability to add <link> tags to their
<head>.  But what if you cannot?

> Where robots.txt works, in that it's intended as a tool that something
> potentially causing TREMENDOUS amount of traffic can use as a guide, is useful
> the same can hardly be said of an index file of this nature.  The favicon.ico
> thing is little more than just another vendor embrace and extend hack.

The analogy isn't quite right here.  favicon.ico generates a lot of
traffic because most browsers request it.  robots.txt is requested by
most well-behaved robots.  This file is intended to be a simple
bootstrap--a way of finding the feeds.  It should be requested
infrequently and by relatively specific tools.

Jeremy
-- 
Jeremy D. Zawodny     |  Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
<Jeremy-LaWf/[email protected]>  |  http://jeremy.zawodny.com/

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.