RE: site-wide metadata discovery

"Danny Ayers" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.syndication.discuss
Message-ID <[email protected]>
[pause]

What are the circumstances in which robots.txt (or any other well-known
file) will be needed?

When will it not be possible/desirable to use <link>?

[esuap]


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Kearney [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 16 October 2003 15:46
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [syndication] site-wide metadata discovery
>
>
> > One concern is that search engines, at least traditionally,
> have implemented
> size
> > limits for robots.txt and excluded sites with overly large
> robots.txt files.
> Not
> > sure if that restriction still applies (most robots requesting
> robots.txt will
> not
> > use the additional information though so robots.txt is not an
> ideal place for
> this)
>
> Good point.  I think we're talking of using something no larger than:
>
> Site-index: default
>         href: http://www.syndic8.com/feedlist.ocs
>         type: http://InternetAlchemy.org/ocs/directory#
>         title: Syndic8 feed list in OCS format
>
> So it's not like that should be an unreasonably large addition.
>
> Likewise, I think the plan is to have the default URL have
> semantics that allow
> for delegation and alternatives.  That default document could
> well also contain
> links to many, many others related to the site.  This would help to allow
> delegation and avoid cluttering the robots.txt file.
>
> -Bill Kearney
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>


 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.