RE: site-wide metadata discovery
"Danny Ayers" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.syndication.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[pause] What are the circumstances in which robots.txt (or any other well-known file) will be needed? When will it not be possible/desirable to use <link>? [esuap] > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Kearney [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 16 October 2003 15:46 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [syndication] site-wide metadata discovery > > > > One concern is that search engines, at least traditionally, > have implemented > size > > limits for robots.txt and excluded sites with overly large > robots.txt files. > Not > > sure if that restriction still applies (most robots requesting > robots.txt will > not > > use the additional information though so robots.txt is not an > ideal place for > this) > > Good point. I think we're talking of using something no larger than: > > Site-index: default > href: http://www.syndic8.com/feedlist.ocs > type: http://InternetAlchemy.org/ocs/directory# > title: Syndic8 feed list in OCS format > > So it's not like that should be an unreasonably large addition. > > Likewise, I think the plan is to have the default URL have > semantics that allow > for delegation and alternatives. That default document could > well also contain > links to many, many others related to the site. This would help to allow > delegation and avoid cluttering the robots.txt file. > > -Bill Kearney > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/