RE: site-wide metadata discovery
"Danny Ayers" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.syndication.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > What are the circumstances in which robots.txt (or any other well-known > > file) will be needed? > > Any time something programmatic is going to embark on discovering > or otherwise > consuming 'some quantity' of URLs from a site. We're pretty > close to that here. Ok, supplementary questions : How did the agent 'hear' about the site? Where does the agent look first? (...and why isn't there a link tag there?) > > When will it not be possible/desirable to use <link>? > > Sites that have fractious and politically charged web site > maintenance policies. > Getting crap onto the "home page" or buried into subsequent pages > is often mired > in endless amounts of politcal maneuvering. Doing the same for > robots.txt is > usually nowhere near as difficult. > > As in, the website admins have free reign inside robots.txt but > have little or > no influence over the 'design' of the HTML pages. Thus they're > saddled with the > burden of 'educating' the powers-that-be. We can all imagine why > this is a > less-than-ideal way to engender their cooperation. Ok, that makes sense. Thanks for reminding me why I'm not doing sysadmin any more ;-) Cheers, Danny. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/