Re: [syndication] Is a Feed the right place for your Data?

Ken MacLeod <ken-VbOJbV3qneKf+c8Povm/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.syndication.rss.devel,gmane.network.syndication.discuss
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Henri Sivonen <[email protected]> writes:

> On Friday, Nov 7, 2003, at 15:32 Europe/Helsinki, Dave Winer wrote:
> 
> > This isn't for aggregators, but if I wanted to load my weblog into
> > another program, I could just loop over all the days and get the
> > RSS data. It's a data interchange format.
> 
> That problem could be solved with (X)HTML alone without a feed
> format. A system could offer the content as one entry per URL as
> chromeless (X)HTML with <link rel="next" ...> for iterating through
> the entries.
> 
> In fact, a feed could be a <link>ed list of (X)HTML documents that
> can be reached from a known URL as /latest.

Very true.

The distinction I see is that a super-simple feed/summary format
provides an efficient index so that one or two hundred complete pages
don't need to be fetched to populate a new "site folder" in a
reader/aggregator.

  -- Ken "on a roll now" MacLeod

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.