Re: [syndication] Is a Feed the right place for your Data?
Ken MacLeod <ken-VbOJbV3qneKf+c8Povm/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.syndication.rss.devel,gmane.network.syndication.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Henri Sivonen <[email protected]> writes: > On Friday, Nov 7, 2003, at 15:32 Europe/Helsinki, Dave Winer wrote: > > > This isn't for aggregators, but if I wanted to load my weblog into > > another program, I could just loop over all the days and get the > > RSS data. It's a data interchange format. > > That problem could be solved with (X)HTML alone without a feed > format. A system could offer the content as one entry per URL as > chromeless (X)HTML with <link rel="next" ...> for iterating through > the entries. > > In fact, a feed could be a <link>ed list of (X)HTML documents that > can be reached from a known URL as /latest. Very true. The distinction I see is that a super-simple feed/summary format provides an efficient index so that one or two hundred complete pages don't need to be fetched to populate a new "site folder" in a reader/aggregator. -- Ken "on a roll now" MacLeod To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/