RSS Revision - IssueCreateProfiles
Ian Davis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.syndication.rss.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The subject refers to this page:
http://internetalchemy.org/wiki/RssIssues/IssueCreateProfiles
Based on the short discussion on that page I'd like to propose that a
revision to the RSS 1.0 specification is split into two parts. The first
part is a specification of the RSS vocabulary, i.e. channel, item,
title, description etc. The second part is a 'syntactic profile' using
that vocabulary. The profile would correspond exactly to the current RSS
1.0 syntax and would be a normative part of the specification.
Note that this is slightly different to the proposal on that page which
suggests creating a looser profile for full RDF use. I'm suggesting that
we take a more limited step here by defining a profile that is
equivilent to the current syntax.
The reasoning behind this is that the RSS elements are often used in
other RDF documents to refer to channels and items. These documents are
not feeds, but descriptions of feeds. Morten talked about this usage in
a message here yesterday.
Separating the syntax from the semantics seems like a useful thing to do
in its own right. It allows reuse of terms and helps ensure consistent
meaning across different uses.
Any thoughts?
Ian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/