Re: RSS Revision - IssueMinimumOneItem
Danny Ayers <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.syndication.rss.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 22:12:51 -0400, Bill Kearney <[email protected]> wrote: > > > OK, I was testing the water with this issue. At least it has provoked > > some interesting discussion. Speaking personally I think that allowing > > zero items isn't a syntax change per se, but I'll accept that it is a > > behavioural change. I'm convinced that 90% of readers will have no > > problem with an empty feed if the rdf:Seq is still present. Sounds well into 'try it and see if anyone yells' territory to me. > In thinking about this a bit I'm struck by the idea that allowing for an > empty feed may well have some utility. Heartbeat? Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/