Re: Atom and RDF
Dare Obasanjo <kpako-/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.syndication.atom.syntax,gmane.comp.web.rdfweb,gmane.comp.web.rdf,gmane.network.syndication.rss.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- Danny Ayers <[email protected]> wrote: > > <enclosure> does appear to have significant flaws, > and was frozen into > the spec that way. Can you name these significant flaws and point out where in the RSS 2.0 spec these flaws are enshrined. > At the time I'm not even sure > Userland were using > it, there certainly wasn't what you'd call > significant deployment. Yet > now, two or so years later it's suddenly the hottest > thing. Ok, maybe > there is a point there in relation to extensibility I knew you'd figure it out. :) > Speaking philosophically, I'm starting to wonder if > the good Mr. Winer > mightn't simply have entered into a pact with some > horned deity or > other... *sigh* Seriously, is such a comment really warranted? ===== THINGS TO DO IF I BECOME AN EVIL OVERLORD #23 I will keep a special cache of low-tech weapons and train my troops in their use. That way -- even if the heroes manage to neutralize my power generator and/or render the standard-issue energy weapons useless -- my troops will not be overrun by a handful of savages armed with spears and rocks. _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com