Re: Re: [FeedValidator] (Fwd) Inconsistency in dcterms date element validation with te

Hi

On Mon 18-Oct-2004 at 01:59:53PM +0100, Phil Shaw wrote:
> 
> This is about my post on the Feed Validator list; how the DC
> module syntax should be validated:
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=5733400&forum_id=37467

Hmm, well I think that the simpler syntax probably makes most sense
for RSS, eg (this is the one I use...):

  <dcterms:created>1998</dcterms:created> 

  http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/dcterms/#created

But since RSS 1.0 feeds are also RDF I'd have thought it makes sense
for the more verbose syntax to be considered as valid RSS also...

Chris

-- 
Chris Croome                               <chris-u/[email protected]>
web design                             http://www.webarchitects.co.uk/ 
web content management                               http://mkdoc.com/   


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/