Re: mod_enclosures proposal

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.network.syndication.rss.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>

--- In [email protected], "Bill Kearney" <ml_yahoo@i...> wrote:
> > Recently there was a some discussions about extensions of RSS 2.0
> > enclosure element and addition of something similar to RSS 1.0. 
> > My friend and I was working in this direction in the scope
> > of one of our projects and we decided to write down our toughts
in the
> > form of a proposal. Everybody is welcome to criticize and
contribute.
> > You can download it at following URL:
> > 
> > http://www.crocodile.org/lord/RSSenclosures.pdf
> 
> If it were made a bit more RDF-like it'd be nice.

We will work on RDF definition for RSS 1.0.
I will send updated proposal shortly. Please let
me know if there is anything else needs to be
clarified/corrected.

We are trying to engage interested parties here to
make this into community effort.

There are some comments on this proposal at
'audvidsyn' mailing list, but apparently people there are most
interested in of audio/video-specific metadata. We are
trying to avoid making enclosure syntax specific to audio/video: 
why can't it be used in future for example to distribute software
updates or any other data? Besides we do not feel that we are 
capable to include about all possible audio/video presentation
information in scope of this proposal. So we just allow people to
include such presentation information in any format (SMIL, playlist,
etc.) as one of enclosures, and reference others, pointing to actual
audio/video data from it (like it is done for MMS).

Sincerely,
Vadim





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.