Re: Re: mod_enclosures proposal

hello

justing having a firts look at the rdf-vocabulary:

<rdf:Property rdf:about="#rel"
rdfs:label="rel">
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#enclosure"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#enclosures"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="&xsd;string"/>
</rdf:Property>

afaik, this means that a subject of statement with predicate #rel has to
be *both* of type enclosure and of type enclosures, which is not what
you mean. A solution would be do define a supeclass of enclosure and
enclosures which could the by the domain of #rel, the same applies for
#desription.

I really like the different kind of enclosures, but would preffer to
have different subclasses of enclosures rather than the #kind-property
with a literal-value in rdf.

Do you think it would be useful to distinguish between enclosures that
should be displayed or played whenever the user accesses the item
(inline-enclosures) and enclosures that requires the user to click on a
"view" or "play" link? if so, mod:ecnlosure could be a full replacement
for the attachment-vocabullary currently used in knobot
http://wymiwyg.org/ontologies/rss/attach.

regards,
reto



[email protected] wrote:
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Bill Kearney" <ml_yahoo@i...> wrote:
> 
> 
>>If it were made a bit more RDF-like it'd be nice.
> 
> 
> We worked little bit on the proposal and now it
> includes RDF schema and more RSS 1.0 examples. New
> version could be downloaded here:
> 
> http://www.crocodile.org/lord/RSSenclosures/RSSenclosures.pdf
> 
> Some people asked for HTML version. Here is one:
> 
> http://www.crocodile.org/lord/RSSenclosures/
> 
> But I recommend PDF, since it have much better formatting.
> 
> Sincerely,
> Vadim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/