Re: mod_enclosures proposal

--- In [email protected], Suzan Foster <su@i...> wrote:

Suzan,

Thanks for taking a look at my schema.

> I saw in your RDF schema that you have enc:enclosures as subclass
of 
> rdf:Seq:

Actually this is a mistake. It was left from our pervious experiments.
Later on we decided not to do this. It should be subclass of
"rdf:Resource".
 
> Looking at your <enc1:kind/> i think you can implement this with 
> standard RDF collections:

I thought about this, but I think RDF collections semantics
is too limited. They have "Alt" and "Seq", but for instance
they do not have "Parallel" (agruably "Bag" could be used for that).
Also it is not clear if "Alt" preserves elements order, which in our
case is important since I suggest to order elements in "alternative"
enclosure in order of fairness to original.

So I would rather shift definition of collection type up to 
application level and use "Seq" as general container. 
This would also allow users to define their own collection types.

Sincerely,
Vadim






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/